National Institute of Relativistic Measure
Measurements exist more as anti-measurements (space) exist less: perception reduces the size of space. Do measurements always imply a value structure of the perceiver? What does it mean to perceive all things?
An attempt to generate resources of dimension that are useful to a colloquial paradigm (perspective), without assuming synonymous discrete measure in distal contexts. An effort to generate an approach to measurement that inherently depends upon relativistic effects associated with any given perspective, this way, it is likely that discrete synonymous measurement will not obfuscate the appreciation of a unified context. This is an effort to reject convenient, albeit false assumptions that are associated with most forms of measurement, the most prominent failure being the [dis-]recognition that stacked, synonymous, overlaid perspective could exist and that that circumstance, theoretically entertained, promotes measures that lose validity in unusual contexts, and thereby obfuscates discovery (particularly in abstract regions, such as circumstances of perceptional sublimation at the edges of dimension... ha, ie known measures are poor at dimensioning anti-dimension, put differently, that knowledge will never describe ignorance). This endeavor is also an effort to separate measurement from being a constituency component of language, by recognizing 'vector' relationships (ratios) in proximity to a given perspective, that, like thermodynamics, tend to be true at any given perspective. The latter objective achieved via the generation of something colloquially referred to as, 'vector math'.
CONTACT EMAIL:
besmart 2024 Peter G. Frazier