a. does the word "change" always imply time? Is it possible for a feature to change in a dimensional space that does not include the feature of time? What other dimension could supplant time as a constituency component of change? Other descriptors of the context of change have to be considered: those other descriptors could be other dimensional components OR time. If time, then does the change of time, require time to occur? ...a change in time, is likely a recursing paradox (a past moment may not actually exist as a reference). If so, then obviously another dimensional feature must exist to impart reference in the system, is this why time changes with movement? Does this mean that the generation of time requires activity in a system? Does more time exist in dense systems? Is momentum the only proof of time? Does time exist or is it a pseudo measure in a context? Is time a false measure that results from the non-recognition that (while useful) memory is not actually a dimensional measure, but rather a practical resource that promotes the life continuity of certain species? At any given present moment (or simply perception without memory), it may be that space imparts information into and around dimensional features such that a feature is augmented in a way that both cultivates and preserves thermodynamically compliant movement, which from an intelligent perspective could be (and perhaps often is) considered to be velocity, and is almost always erroneously consider to be proof of the existence of time (as if time is a inherent aspect of a dimensional space, rather than a resource of intelligence describing that dimension space). That time is not an inherent feature of dimension, but rather that time is a reference to memory associated with a perspective (accumulated artwork / sense of a perspective) that imparts the illusion of something referred to as time. It may be that antimatter is somewhat synonymous with the concept of space, and perhaps that anti-matter augments matter (as described above), in a way that imparts information to components like mass, such that continuity is perceived by those who have memory, rather than that continuity as being magically part of that dimensional space (often referred to as "space-time"). This is important because without true attribution pertaining to the artwork of intelligence (perception and memory), then those features will tend to be discounted and/or not rewarded. It could be that dimentia is a long-term symptom resulting from the devaluation of intelligence.
...the long mystery of her mind.
Fascinatingly enough, the belief that time is an absolute feature of a dimensional paradigm may be evidence of extreme communal delusion: that the belief that time exists devoid of intelligence perception is delusion. A delusion that reinforces interests of disease, rather than the interests of intelligence.
besmart 2024 Peter G. Frazier