an attempt to describe the circumstance of entropy:
the existence of entropy is evidence of a theoretical point/occurrence/feature that is separate from the known dimensional paradigm, where the perception of that theoretical feature, without an increase in perceptional capacity, can only be perceived through a indirect observation akin to phosphorescence. This means that entropy is NEVER a direct analogue extension of a known dimensional context, AND always indicates the presence of ignorance/anti-dimension. Entropy is an anti-dimensional feature, that it is theoretical only, where it's existence only denotes perceptual limitations associated with a given perspective. Etymologically, "entropy" appears to be akin to the semi-analogous male precept of "trophy" in that entropy (in the context of the precept "Mecca"), appears to be a reference to something that motivates a women... that Eve [E5e, 5ee: see] requires perfect sense, and that sense is acquired via the transmutation of anti-dimension [entropy] to dimension, in a process described as learning [achieved increased capacity of perception], thus with discovery comes the mitigation of entropy, thereby liberating Eve from subjugation/obligation [where that subjugation/obligation is denoted via the character "n" in the word "entropy"].... Humorously, "never" is almost exactly the same word as "entropy," while the word "ever," is a reference to perfect perception.
Discrete/digital systems (ie binary computation) will tend towards the generation of entropy, whereas analogue systems (comparators, etc.) will tend towards thermodynamic equilibrium / sense. An answer is not the mitigation of all information except for that which you want to see, but rather an answer is the preservation of information (synonymous with cloaking); practically, a modality that preserves the most information... thinking is the only answer.
besmart 2024 Peter G. Frazier